Gigaram PC3500 1GB Dual Channel Kit

Written by John Chen    Monday, 14 June 2004 11:00
Article Index
Gigaram PC3500 1GB Dual Channel Kit
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
All Pages
Introduction

Gigaram is not a well known memory manufacturer.  It was only recently established in 1996 and operates under the concept of being the "Innovator in Memory Module Design & Manufacturing."  Large OEM companies may have heard about them, but why not us?  It's because they focus on producing memory modules for OEM systems.  Mass consumers, like us, who insist on building systems with our own two hands will only know of large memory companies like Corsair, Kingston, OCZ, and Mushkin.  Gigaram has now opened a new door and stepped up to directly provide consumers with their high quality memory.  For this review, Gigaram has graciously provided us with a sample of their memory.  Do they have what it takes to compete with the already well known memory manufacturers?  Read on to find out.

 


 

Gigaram PC3500

The sample we have on hand today is a 1GB kit of PC3500 memory.  Although the only vendor that I've seen selling Gigaram (Newegg) does not sell Gigaram in dual channel kits, these memory modules are fully capable of running together in a dual channel system.  Surprisingly, there are still many enthusiasts out there who believe that only memory in dual channel labeled memory kits are capable of running dual channel.  That is NOT true.  Memory manufacturers label their memory dual channel and sell it in a kit to provide their customers with two of the most compatible modules. This eliminates possible incompatibility issues that may arise from separate sticks, as memory manufacturers do not always use the same chips for their line of memory.  Corsair XMS is known to use a variety of ICs, ranging from Infineon to Winbond.  Mixing sticks with different ICs can result in system errors and hangings.  Dual channel is a motherboard inherent feature; as long as there are two sticks of memory in the proper DIMM slots, then dual channel will be enabled.

Anyway, back to our Gigaram sample.  The memory we received came nicely packaged in a cardboard box--it's plain and that's all it needs.  I feel that there is no need for fancy artwork as the box is going in the trash anyway. 

 

Gigaram did a nice job with insuring the safety of the modules.  The memory was sealed inside anti-static bags and not inside plastic like many other companies.  There was foam padding inside the box to hold the ram in place.  I feel it's better to spend more money on safe packaging rather than fancy packaging. 

Removing the modules from the anti-static bag revealed two simple looking modules.  Right from the start, I noticed that Gigaram has moved away from the traditional regular memory that is just PCB and ICs.  They have outfitted their modules with silver painted aluminum heat spreaders.  Although heat spreaders do absolutely nothing in regards to memory cooling, it does look very nice.  These heat spreaders are the same ones that can be found on the Corsair XMS Platinum memory, and are also the blue aluminum heat spreaders that Thermaltake sells.  However, there was one small difference--even though thermal tape was used, there were no clips to hold the heat spreaders together.  I guess there is no need for clips as the thermal tape bond is very strong.

There is a simple sticker label on the each heat spreader indicating the model, speed, and size of each stick.  Overclockers normally look for single sided modules as they overclock better.  Due to recent games needing more than 512MB, overclockers are forced to use double sided memory so they can pack their systems with 1GB.  The Gigaram PC3500 we have today is double sided, like the rest of the 512MB modules. 

As you may know, tampering with the memory will void all warranties; but what kind of overclocker would I be if I didn't take the heat spreaders off and checked out what's underneath?  I removed the heat spreaders, which were stuck on firmly, and found that Gigaram uses Samsung ICs.

TCCC is Samsung's way of defining their IC speed and model number.  It's rated at 5ns, which equates to 200MHZ.  The F denotes the generation of the chip.  I've come across D, E, and F generations in my experiences.  Enthusiasts will know that Samsung chips are decent in overclocking, but do not perform so well under high voltages. 



 

Test System and Overclocking

Test System:

  • Intel P4 3.0C
  • Abit AI7 (GAT all on AUTO)
  • Radeon 9800 Pro (Omega Drivers based on Catalyst 4.4)
  • 2 x 256MB OCZ PC3200 Platinum Limited Edition
  • 2 x 512MB Gigaram PC3500

Overclocking:

Memory at stock speeds and stock timings run just as fast as all the other RAM at the same speed and timings, give or take a small difference in performance.  They are all relatively the same.  Overclocking is where the field spreads.  There are specific companies and specific chips that can overclock better than others.  My two personal favorite are OCZ and Kingston HyperX.  Now let's see what these Gigaram modules can do.

The Samsung 5ns ICs are rated to run 200MHZ at timings of 3-3-3-8.  The Gigaram representative informed me that these PC3500 modules are rated to run 217MHZ at timings of 3-4-4-8.  Thus the overclocking process begins.  I installed the memory and ran into no troubles at all.  It defaulted to 2.5-4-4-7 in SPD.  I was not hesitant to lower the timings, and eventually came across 2.5-3-3-6.  That was the lowest I could get the memory to run; higher voltage didn't help decrease the timings any lower.  Gradually, I topped out at 230FSB with timings of 2.5-3-3-6.  It didn't even need more than 2.9v to achieve that speed.  That's a pretty decent overclock for such budget memory.  I loosened the timings and see if it would help the overclocking progress.  I raised the timings to 3-4-4-7 and kept the voltage at 2.9v, and hit a wall at 235FSB.  Is gaining 5FSB worth raising the latencies to maximum?  I guess you'll find out later in results.

  • 230FSB with timings of 2.5-3-3-6
  • 235FSB with timings of 3-4-4-7

I have to note that voltage higher than 2.9v did not help with overclocking.  This is important, in that most motherboards only supply a maximum of 2.8v or 2.9v in their overclocking options.  This means that this memory won't be voltage hungry and hold you back, nor does it require you to perform voltage modifications to your motherboard.  This is aimed at simple and basic overclocking--just install and you're off.

 


 

Results

Testing will be done with the usual benchmark programs, such as 3DMark and PCMark.  Unreal Tournament 2003 will be the game used to test the actual performance gains and losses.  Video card settings were all set to auto and application preferences.  Testing results will mainly focus on the performance of the Gigaram memory against the low latency of the OCZ BH6 memory.  Everyone knows that lower latencies mean better performance, but just by how much?  We will take a look at the average latencies against the low latencies and see if Gigaram's PCB design has anything to do with performance.

Super PI

Super PI is a program that calculates the value of PI.  The 1M represents the calculation of PI to the one millionth decimal.  As you can see, having low latencies will help speed up the calculation process by one second.  The increased FSB scores were the same; there might be a slight difference, but not enough to distinguish itself as a whole second.

SiSoft Sandra

Here we can see that the lower latencies really do come into play.  The lowered latencies gained roughly less than 100 points.  I guess the Samsung chips and the Gigaram PCB worked well together to keep up with the low latency stuff.

3DMark2001SE

Futuremark's 3DMark2001SE benchmark tests the entire system's performance.  3DMark2001SE consists of four tests; and each one tests a specific part of the system.  Since all variables other than memory speed and timings were kept consistent, the score difference will decide the performance of the memory.  Here we see the low latency scoring a hundred or so points higher than the Gigaram.  What surprised me was when the Gigaram scored one point higher than the low latency memory when the FSB was raised.  Not bad at all.

 


 

Results Continued

PCMark

Futuremark's PCMark memory benchmark tests the decoding, encoding, zipping, extracting of files.  And of course, the larger the amount of memory, the faster the process.  The low latency tries to catch up but still loses in this round.  Having 1GB of memory definitely improves file loading and unloading speeds. 

UT2K3

Unreal Tournament 2003 is a popular game among enthusiasts.  The graphs clearly show the results.  Lower latencies means better gaming performance, even if it's just by a couple of frames per second.  If you happen to have a poor graphics card, then having lower latencies can help--somewhat.  But nonetheless, enthusiasts looking to have the best performance possible should still stick with low latency memory. 

A Boo Boo:

I ran into a problem during installation.  The heat spreaders were not applied correctly, thus hindering proper installation in the DIMM slots.  These pictures reveal the problem.

See what I mean now?  It can become dangerous if you're a LAN gamer.  Any sudden movements and the memory can slide out easily.  I corrected the problem myself by ripping off the heat spreader and reapplying it properly, avoiding the DIMM slot clasp.  Remember, do this at your own cost.  InsaneTek and Gigaram assume no responsibility. 

 


 

Conclusion and Thoughts

Gigaram PC3500 memory is not the best.  As clearly shown in the results, it provides good performance but cannot win an enthusiast's heart.  However, that does not mean that it performs poorly.  In fact, it performed spectacularly well.  Giagram has released this memory to the mass market and proved themselves to be great budget memory.  Those of you strapped for cash should give Gigaram a chance.  It performed well, it's reasonably priced, and offers great overclocking potential.  With just 2.9v, I was able to run it at 230FSB with timings of 2.5-3-3-6.  Many of the other brands of memory will need more juice than just 2.9v.  I didn't test the memory at 235FSB with timings of 3-4-4-7 as that is just plain silly.  The only time I would run timings that loose would be to run the memory at 250FSB+. 

With the Gigaram memory priced at under $200 ($198 to be exact), it can't better than this.  Budget users rejoice, there is finally something good that doesn't cost an arm and a leg--and you don't have to buy crap memory!

Pros:

  • Awesome performance
  • Cheap price
  • Includes heat spreader
  • Lifetime warranty
  • Great overclocking potential

Cons:

  • Heat spreader not installed correctly
  • Can't run low latencies
  • Increased voltage does not help overclocking

We would like to thank Gigaram for providing us the sample.  If you have any questions or comments, feel free to hit us up in the forums. You can also check out more of our latest reviews on the front page.

 

 

 

 

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh